Form «Comment of a reviewer on article»

COLLECTION OF PAPERS
«ПСИХОЛІНГВІСТИКА»,
«ПСИХОЛИНГВИСТИКА»,
«PSYCHOLINGUISTICS»

Periodic collection of papers issued by SHEE

«Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi state pedagogical

university named after Hryhoriy Skovoroda»,

Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine

 

Editor-in-chief: Prof. Kalmykova L.A.

   

COMMENT OF A REVIEWER ON ARTICLE

______________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________

article title

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Author (-ors)

 

 

The originality and relevance of the article____________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Matching of titles and abstracts to article content_______________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

The degree of scientific innovation in a research (what is proved, received, established, defined,
proposed for the first time, improvements for further development etc.____________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

The value of the results for further development of the theory and practice of scientific field__________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

The relevance and correctness of using methods and materials that reveal the content of the study
and its statistics __________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Motivation of the structural components of text, illustrations, design quality of sketches_____________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Completeness of theoretical and experimental data representation; relevance of the results to studied realities
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Compliance between findings, purpose and objectives of the study, their validity and credibility______________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

A sufficient number of sources and their matching to content____________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

The quality of the literature study and design of a reference list__________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Relevance of the article as a whole and its individual elements to prescribed edited volume
(text, tables, illustrations, citations)__________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

The correctness and validity of the manuscript (scientific style, adopted terminology, clarity of wording,
clarity for perception, logicality, consistency of presentation, argumentation, etc.)__________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

Structuring the article with the requirements and standards for scientific publications under Regulation of HAC
of Ukraine of 15.03.2003 p. №7-05 / 1, Order of the Ministry of Education, Sports and Youth of Ukraine № 1111
from 17.10.2012 on the «Procedure for formation of the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine»______
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 
EVALUATION OF ARTICLES QUALITY
(tick the appropriate box) 
 
RECOMMENDATIONS OF A REVIEWER
(tick the appropriate box)

Meets a sectoral profile of the Collection

May be recommended for publication
in the submitted form

Makes a contribution to the development
of the problem

Should be amended on the basis
of reviewer’s proposals

Qualitative, original and important for
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________

Require significant linguistic and
stylistic technical wording

Does not meet the eligibility criteria
for scientific publications

Require additional review
(Suggestions of a reviewer, name / w)
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________

Does not meet the requirements
of sectoral profile of the Collection

Decline

 

 

DEBATABLE PROBLEMS UPDATED BY A REVIEWER

Comments and suggestions of a reviewer is an important part of the review. They must be expressed and formed in a way they can be sent directly to the author (-ors) unchanged and eliminate debatable aspects (theses, regulations), pointed by a reviewer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVIEWER
__________________________________________________

______________________
  Name Signature

 

 

Address of the editorial office:
SHEE «Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi State Pedagogical University named after Hryhoriy Skovoroda»,
apt 207, laboratory «Psycholinguistics of development», Suhomlynskyi str. 30,
Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi, Kyiv region., 08401.

Тел.: +38-063-591-92-17; +38-097-525-21-42  • E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 http://psychling.phdpu.edu.ua

INDEXING

book3.jpg
<< < May 2017 > >>
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
260512
Today
Yesterday
This Week
This Month
All days
1
135
2919
8170
260512

Your IP: 54.158.221.251